Cessna 162 Skycatcher: It’s Here!
Cessna's successor to the 152, the Skycatcher, is poised to shine in the trainer market
The proliferation of LSA since the FAA announced the first approval at Sun ’n Fun 2005 has been little short of amazing. LSA Editor at Large Jim Lawrence suggests that there now are more than 100 different LSA models.You can’t help but recall the similar rush to create the GA market following World War II. In those days, practically everyone with a slide rule and a drawing board was designing little airplanes for the plethora of military pilots returning from Europe and the Pacific. It was a boom that turned bust in record time, leaving the dregs of several dozen aircraft companies in its wake.
With Cessna’s heritage as the most popular manufacturer of GA trainers, the Wichita company was virtually guaranteed to enter this new market. The Model 162 Skycatcher was announced by Cessna President Jack Pelton in 2006, and by the time you read this, the first production airplane will have been delivered.
Cessna hopes the Skycatcher will help solve a major problem at Cessna since the demise of the 152. Like Piper and the old Beech Aircraft, Cessna always has fostered a basic trainer in hopes of strengthening the step-up market. The premise is that pilots who train in a particular brand are more likely to buy from the same manufacturer. Trouble is, the pilot population in general and student starts in particular have both declined dramatically in the last 30 years. In 1980, there were 820,000 licensed pilots. By 2007, that number had shrunk to well below 600,000. Though there was a slight improvement in the pilot population last year, Cessna knew it needed to facilitate the recovery by offering a new trainer of its own.
Despite the Skyhawk’s remarkable simplicity and durability, it always has been too much airplane for the job, both in operating cost and purchase price. I recently reported on a new 2009 Skyhawk with a base price of $297,000. I know of a flight school in Long Beach, Calif., that rents a 2008 Skyhawk SP for $159 hourly. For flight schools struggling to survive in a tough economy, the hourly rate is the primary key to profit, and even if a new Skyhawk is a leaseback, the rental rate may be prohibitive for all but the most affluent students.
The Skycatcher was intended to confront that problem head-on. Accordingly, the base price has been set at $112,250, and Cessna calculates a typically equipped plane will go out the door at $130,364. At only 40% of the Skyhawk’s cost and half the operating expense, it’s hard to imagine a new Skycatcher renting for as much as a 172. Cessna loaned the first production-conforming airplane to San Diego’s King Schools, which is developing the Cessna Pilot Center private pilot training curriculum. From there, Cessna ferried the 162 to AOPA’s Aviation Summit in Tampa, Fla., and that’s where I flew the first machine with Cessna Chief Pilot Kirby Ortega.
Page 1 of 4
Share this page.
Denis Boudreaux makes this comment
Monday 8 March, 2010
Rick Bennette makes this comment
Monday 1 March, 2010
john makes this comment
Wednesday 27 January, 2010
Sean C makes this comment
Tuesday 26 January, 2010
The Useful Load is 490lb so he and I would only have room for 6.6 gal of fuel without going over gross.
If I fly with my wife I would have enough fuel for 2 hours plus reserves.
If you don't like the plane that's fine, pick another aircraft.
Barry Gloger makes this comment
Thursday 17 December, 2009
As for the fixed seat, I have only a 31” inseam, yet when I sat in a prototype, I couldn’t touch the foot controls as my knees were jammed into the panel. The only CFI’s employable will be 5’ 100lb petites and only the Olson twins will be able to go on a weekend jaunt with charts and luggage.
The problem started with the FAA limiting LSA gross weight to 1320 lbs, which as far as I can tell, was arbitrarily chosen solely because 600 kgs is a nice round number. While I agree with the other safety parameters (air speed, stall speed etc), they should have started with a useful payload of 550 lbs, flight time of 4 hrs with reserve, mandated a BRS and let the gross weight fall where it may.
The FAA needs to revise the LSA Rule.
Barry Gloger makes this comment
Thursday 17 December, 2009
PART 1
Bill Cox, in his review of the Cessna Skycatcher, concludes, “Pilots will be … hard-pressed to find anything to dislike about it.” YEAH, except for the 75% of the population who can’t fit in it. Cessna really missed the mark, when they designed it with a payload of only 346 lbs (311 with the BRS parachute – would you buy a new car that lacked airbags, especially one designed for novices?).
Only 25% of American men weigh less than 170 lbs; 50%
Barry Gloger makes this comment
Thursday 17 December, 2009
Bill Cox, in his review of the Cessna Skycatcher, concludes, “Pilots will be … hard-pressed to find anything to dislike about it.” YEAH, except for the 75% of the population who can’t fit in it. Cessna really missed the mark, when they designed it with a payload of only 346 lbs (311 with the BRS parachute – would you buy a new car that lacked airbags, especially one designed for novices?).
Only 25% of American men weigh less than 170 lbs; 50% ting LSA gross weight to 1320 lbs, which as far as I can tell, was arbitrarily chosen solely because 600 kgs is a nice round number. While I agree with the other safety parameters (air speed, stall speed etc), they should have started with a useful payload of 550 lbs, flight time of 4 hrs with reserve, mandated a BRS and let the gross weight fall where it may.
The FAA needs to revise the LSA Rule.
Barry Gloger makes this comment
Thursday 17 December, 2009
Only 25% of American men weigh less than 170 lbs; 50% twins will be able to go on a weekend jaunt with charts and luggage.
The problem started with the FAA limiting LSA gross weight to 1320 lbs, which as far as I can tell, was arbitrarily chosen soly because 600 kgs is a nice round number. While I agree with the other safety parameters (air speed, stall speed etc), they should have started with a useful payload of 550 lbs, flight time of 4 hrs with reserve, mandated a BRS and let the gross weight fall where it may.
The FAA needs to revise the LSA Rule.