Going Direct: The Future Of Light GA And The Four-Seat Family Plane

In a panel discussion at Sebring, I spoke with some sport aviation experts about the state of certification, and by the end of the forum we’d come to some interesting conclusions.

At the Sport Aviation Expo in Sebring on Thursday, I sat down for a conversation about certification with sport aviation veterans Sebastien Heintz, president of Zenith Aircraft, Tom Peghiny, President of Fight Design North America, and Dan Johnson, president of the Light Aircraft Manufacturers Association. Between them they represent around 150 years of experience in the sport aviation world. They’ve lived this world for many years, and each one has had a wealth of experience in the industry. They’re all experienced pilots, too.

Sport Aviation Expo
Courtesy of Sport Aviation Expo

The question at heart was this: How will consensus standards, the driving certification concept behind the Light Sport category, affect the production of new personal transportation and recreational airplanes going forward. As you probably know, the FAA has adopted consensus standards as the way forward for much of what had formerly been the purview of Part 23. That method, while it helped the industry turn out really airworthy new planes, came with mountains of paperwork and hot-and-cold running FAA inspectors weighing in on every detail of manufacturing, often in areas where the manufacturers had a lot more expertise. The new Part 23 will put a lot of the responsibility and freedom in the hands of the airplane makers. Under consensus standards, they will essentially be self-approving the design.

The concept, Dan Johnson pointed out, only works if the FAA is will to accept an equivalent level of safety, which is not an “equal” level, he made clear, but an “acceptable” one. He applauded the FAA for getting to the point where it made that leap.

Tom Peghiny discussed what he sees as the possible or perhaps probable future for LSA-like birds, and he thinks, based on what he’s seen from Europe’s approach to it through its Advanced Ultralight category, that we’re likely to get the removal of the speed limit from some form of LSA, along with the approval of four-seaters and the adoption of new engines.

Sebastien Heintz, who worked directly on the Zenith Alarus program that developed a two-seat Part 23 trainer and on an LSA model, says that Zenith is focusing exclusively on kits theses days, something he says makes business sense as there’s a great niche for their products, which sell for a far lower price than any LSA because it takes a lot of production hours out of the factory’s column and transfers them to the builder. And because of advances in technology, he said that building kits is getting easier, faster and less involved, a trend he sees continuing, though he did stop short of predicting 3-D printed planes. Sweat equity, he made clear, will be an integral part of homebuilding for the foreseeable future, though that’s not necessarily a bad thing. I’ve never built an airplane, but I know I’d love it.

At the end of the day, we got to the point where we realized that there are four big conversations that every discussion of certification rules must address. They are safety, innovation, production and cost. All of these, of course, are interrelated.

And while the Light Sport Category hasn’t been without its challenges, Johnson did point out that since its introduction just over ten years ago, there have been 140 new LSA designs approved. I haven’t counted, but off the top of my head I’m guessing that during that time we’ve had about a dozen new Part 23 light planes in that time.

Will a new Part 23 future bring with it truly affordable light planes? Johnson is skeptical. He thinks that it will bring about planes that cost a lot less than the cheapest brand new Part 23 planes on the market today, but he’d be surprised to see them get much below the level of the slickest LSAs, which is around $130,000, and he thought that around $200,000 was a more realistic bar for most.

If for that price we can get faster, more fuel efficient, four seaters, we all agreed, that might be a future that will feature a lot of airplane sales.

If you want more commentary on all things aviation, go to our Going Direct blog archive.

4 thoughts on “Going Direct: The Future Of Light GA And The Four-Seat Family Plane

  1. Robert,

    That was a good article but it certainly didn’t answer any questions. Perhaps the article was to open the question to everyone.

    With all the technology available and the safety available to make aircraft safer and even less expensive per what a normal aircraft was 10 years ago, it still leaves us with things that really need addressing.
    1) aircraft needs backups like a parachute.
    2) it needs good avionics which can help to prevent needless fatalities.
    3) Get rid of the speed marker of 120 knots. With better engines and turbos, we are getting better fuel efficiency and better aerodynamics. That means we could go faster and farther.
    4) if LSA is going to continue as a marker that manufacturers must abide by, then increase the 1320 lbs and raise it to 1750 to 2000 lbs. And raise experimental from 1500 lbs to 2200 to 2600 lbs. It only takes a larger engine to go over the extra 180 lbs currently available. Who in the world came up with only 180 lbs??? Somewhere along the line we need to be real about arbitrary numbers just getting adopted. Usually it is experimental because the customer wanted a 4 seat aircraft. So what it logically includes is 4 seats? More people, add 200 lbs each = 400 lbs. A larger stronger engine, add 200 to 300 lbs. Added fuel for a larger aircraft.

    Added fuel 40 gallons at 6 lbs per gallon = 240 lbs and that excludes the added tank weight. 2 nice chairs and a larger aircraft, add 100-150 lbs. I’m not going over on actual weight here. We need extra luggage for the trip or for the family. If the kids don’t weigh much, what they want to bring sure does, along with time and those children get heavier.

    Add up and round on the low side, and you get 600 lbs. That doesn’t include the extra weight in strength for the plane or the larger cabin at all. What is more important, a plane making weight or a plane made to the highest standards using cutting edge technology and room to experiment, even in the LSA classification.

    We aren’t giving away the farm by allowing LSA to be able to stretch its legs and come out as quality aircraft companies as they are. Allow America to be America. If aircraft companies want to sell kits then fine. But not every person enjoys such things. Are we saying they must conform because they MUST build part of that plane? If people want to do it and save money, that is great. But to say one size fits all, isn’t the land of the free and the home of the brave!


  2. Yes! Honorable Mr. Goyer. When Part 23 will allow retractable gear, variable-pitch propeller and no speed limit. It appears that the Europeans got it right, and they are killing it with the best designs and performance. Look at what is coming out of light aircraft (think of carbon fiber and composit) that put our 50’s era aluminum crafts to shame. The market is there; one just have to allow it, instead of “experimental-exhibition” classification. We ought of built it here.

  3. Your conclusion is the same as mine: I was an early depositor for the Columbia 300, based on the Lancair ES, when it was sold as “200 knots for $200 grand.” Of course, as it developed, and the FAA got involved as a Part 23 aircraft… I dropped out when the price exceeded $350 grand. Fly an older 182 now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *